ZTF18abujsbq
Complex light-curve behavior with limited physical interpretation
The object is not well explained by a single smooth bump. Its r-band detections show repeated or irregular variability texture, while template and catalog-context checks remain limited by available context.
147 detections, 674 non-detections in g, r; span 2840.14 days
Evidence triage: high 10/10 (available)
anomaly_assessment is an evidence triage summary inside this case file. It summarizes available signals for review; it is not an object-identity claim.
- 147 detections provide a relatively dense local record.
- Coverage spans 2840 days, enough to inspect long-baseline behavior.
- Both g and r observations are present for cross-band review.
This deterministic assessment supports review triage only. It is not a classification, model verdict, or claim about physical identity.
Review priority: high 9/10
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic; it orders entries for inspection and is not a model result.
- Gaussian bump comparator indicates the single smooth bump is not a clean fit.
- Variability texture suggests repeated or irregular behavior.
- Standard descriptive features were computed.
- Template-family probe is limited by missing required context.
- Cross-survey context was not requested.
- A recommended next check is recorded for human review.
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic. It orders the review queue for inspection; it is not a model score or object-identity claim.
Gaussian: fitted_baseline
Variability: computed
Features: computed
sncosmo: missing_required_context
Catalog context: not_requested
Top next check: Run the optional cross-survey context check at RA=286.67280, Dec=9.63316 if network access and optional dependencies are available.
HTML Markdown JSON Light curve Residuals
ZTF18abbdazk
Mixed evidence with cautious interpretation
The Gaussian bump comparator fit, but reduced chi-squared is 2.2, so the single smooth bump captures only part of the point-to-point behavior. The variability texture comparator found changes that are comparable to the reported photometric errors. Together, these suggest the r-band detections are not fully captured by one smooth bump.
19 detections, 201 non-detections in g, r; span 2897.04 days
Evidence triage: high 8/10 (available)
anomaly_assessment is an evidence triage summary inside this case file. It summarizes available signals for review; it is not an object-identity claim.
- 19 detections provide a usable local record.
- Coverage spans 2897 days, enough to inspect long-baseline behavior.
- Both g and r observations are present for cross-band review.
This deterministic assessment supports review triage only. It is not a classification, model verdict, or claim about physical identity.
Review priority: high 7/10
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic; it orders entries for inspection and is not a model result.
- Gaussian bump comparator indicates the single smooth bump is not a clean fit.
- Standard descriptive features were computed.
- Template-family probe is limited by missing required context.
- Cross-survey context was not requested.
- A recommended next check is recorded for human review.
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic. It orders the review queue for inspection; it is not a model score or object-identity claim.
Gaussian: fitted_baseline
Variability: computed
Features: computed
sncosmo: missing_required_context
Catalog context: not_requested
Top next check: Run the optional cross-survey context check at RA=286.62936, Dec=1.94183 if network access and optional dependencies are available.
HTML Markdown JSON Light curve Residuals
ZTF18aaxddtg
Mixed evidence with cautious interpretation
The Gaussian bump comparator fit the r-band detections cleanly within the reported errors. The variability texture comparator found changes that are comparable to the reported photometric errors. Together, these favor a simple one-bump description over repeated or irregular texture in the current r-band detections. Coverage appears sparse or uneven, so cadence may affect the comparison.
10 detections, 212 non-detections in g, r; span 2917.05 days
Evidence triage: medium 5/10 (available)
anomaly_assessment is an evidence triage summary inside this case file. It summarizes available signals for review; it is not an object-identity claim.
- 10 detections provide a usable local record.
- Coverage spans 2917 days, enough to inspect long-baseline behavior.
- Both g and r observations are present for cross-band review.
This deterministic assessment supports review triage only. It is not a classification, model verdict, or claim about physical identity.
Review priority: medium 4/10
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic; it orders entries for inspection and is not a model result.
- Standard descriptive features were computed.
- Template-family probe is limited by missing required context.
- Cross-survey context was not requested.
- A recommended next check is recorded for human review.
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic. It orders the review queue for inspection; it is not a model score or object-identity claim.
Gaussian: fitted_baseline
Variability: computed
Features: computed
sncosmo: missing_required_context
Catalog context: not_requested
Top next check: Run the optional cross-survey context check at RA=284.45227, Dec=9.60622 if network access and optional dependencies are available.
HTML Markdown JSON Light curve Residuals
ZTF17aabblzo
Evidence is limited by available comparator context
Some evidence layers are missing, failed, or limited by the available local detections. The case file supports cautious review rather than a firm conclusion.
3 detections, 246 non-detections in g, r; span 2865.02 days
Evidence triage: medium 3/10 (available)
anomaly_assessment is an evidence triage summary inside this case file. It summarizes available signals for review; it is not an object-identity claim.
- Coverage spans 2865 days, enough to inspect long-baseline behavior.
- Both g and r observations are present for cross-band review.
This deterministic assessment supports review triage only. It is not a classification, model verdict, or claim about physical identity.
Review priority: medium 3/10
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic; it orders entries for inspection and is not a model result.
- Template-family probe is limited by insufficient usable data.
- Cross-survey context was not requested.
- A recommended next check is recorded for human review.
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic. It orders the review queue for inspection; it is not a model score or object-identity claim.
Gaussian: insufficient_data
Variability: insufficient_data
Features: insufficient_data
sncosmo: insufficient_data
Catalog context: not_requested
Top next check: Run the optional cross-survey context check at RA=12.50755, Dec=42.65244 if network access and optional dependencies are available.
HTML Markdown JSON Light curve
ZTF18abdtfcl
Evidence is limited by available comparator context
Some evidence layers are missing, failed, or limited by the available local detections. The case file supports cautious review rather than a firm conclusion.
17 detections, 174 non-detections in g, r; span 2503.07 days
Evidence triage: high 7/10 (available)
anomaly_assessment is an evidence triage summary inside this case file. It summarizes available signals for review; it is not an object-identity claim.
- 17 detections provide a usable local record.
- Coverage spans 2503 days, enough to inspect long-baseline behavior.
- Both g and r observations are present for cross-band review.
This deterministic assessment supports review triage only. It is not a classification, model verdict, or claim about physical identity.
Review priority: medium 3/10
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic; it orders entries for inspection and is not a model result.
- Template-family probe is limited by missing required context.
- Cross-survey context was not requested.
- A recommended next check is recorded for human review.
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic. It orders the review queue for inspection; it is not a model score or object-identity claim.
Gaussian: insufficient_data
Variability: insufficient_data
Features: insufficient_data
sncosmo: missing_required_context
Catalog context: not_requested
Top next check: Run the optional cross-survey context check at RA=254.67831, Dec=-23.74590 if network access and optional dependencies are available.
HTML Markdown JSON Light curve
ZTF18abduuff
Evidence is limited by available comparator context
Some evidence layers are missing, failed, or limited by the available local detections. The case file supports cautious review rather than a firm conclusion.
2 detections, 153 non-detections in g, r; span 2546.08 days
Evidence triage: unknown 0/10 (insufficient_data)
anomaly_assessment is an evidence triage summary inside this case file. It summarizes available signals for review; it is not an object-identity claim.
- Only 2 usable detection(s) are present, below the minimum for a stable review assessment.
This deterministic assessment supports review triage only. It is not a classification, model verdict, or claim about physical identity.
Review priority: medium 3/10
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic; it orders entries for inspection and is not a model result.
- Template-family probe is limited by insufficient usable data.
- Cross-survey context was not requested.
- A recommended next check is recorded for human review.
Review priority is a queue sorting heuristic. It orders the review queue for inspection; it is not a model score or object-identity claim.
Gaussian: insufficient_data
Variability: insufficient_data
Features: insufficient_data
sncosmo: insufficient_data
Catalog context: not_requested
Top next check: Run the optional cross-survey context check at RA=258.22591, Dec=-20.73201 if network access and optional dependencies are available.
HTML Markdown JSON Light curve
